GM1 ML.A.302  Aircraft maintenance programme    

CAA ORS9 Decision No. 1

The responsibilities associated with maintenance programmes developed in accordance with ML.A.302 are the following:

(a) If the owner has contracted a CAMO or CAO in order to manage the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft, this organisation is responsible for developing and approving a maintenance programme which:

(1) indicates whether this programme is based on data from the DAH or on the MIP described in ML.A.302(d);

(2) identifies the owner and the specific aircraft, engine, and propeller (as applicable);

(3) includes all mandatory continuing airworthiness information and any additional tasks derived from the assessment of the DAH’s instructions;

(4) justifies any deviations from the DAH’s instructions; when the DAH’s instructions are the basis for the AMP development, these deviations should not fall below the requirements of the MIP; and(5) is customised to the particular aircraft type, configuration and operation, in accordance with ML.A.302(c)(5).

(b) If the owner has not contracted a CAMO or CAO in order to manage the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft, then the owner is responsible for developing and declaring the maintenance programme, assuming full responsibility for its content, and for any deviations from the DAH’s instructions (ref. ML.A.201(f) and ML.A.302(c)(7)) and the possible consequences of such deviations. In this case, these deviations do not need to be justified, but are to be identified in the AMP. However, the maintenance programme still needs to comply with the requirements contained in ML.A.302(c), in particular with the obligation to not fall below the requirements of the MIP and to comply with the mandatory continuing airworthiness information.

(c) The content of the owner-declared maintenance programme cannot be challenged up front either by the CAA or by the contracted maintenance organisation. This declared maintenance programme is the basis for adequate planning of maintenance, as well as for the ARs and the aircraft continuing airworthiness monitoring (ACAM) inspections in accordance with ML.B.303. Nevertheless, the maintenance programme will be subject to periodic reviews at the occasion of the AR and, in case of discrepancies, linked with deficiencies in the content of the maintenance programme, the owner shall amend the maintenance programme accordingly, as required by ML.A.302(c)(9).

(d) When the CAA is notified of deficiencies linked with the content of the declared maintenance programme for a particular aircraft (in case no agreement is reached between the owner and the AR staff about the changes required in the maintenance programme), the CAA should contact the owner, request a copy of the maintenance programme, decide  which  amendment  to  the  AMP  is  necessary  and  raise  the  associated   finding  (ref. ML.A.302(c)(9)). If necessary, the CAA may also react in accordance with ML.B.304. Based on the information received, the reported deficiencies and the identified risks, the  competent  authority  may  in  addition  adapt  the   ACAM   programme   accordingly   (ref. ML.B.303).

(e) Although there is no requirement for the owner to send a copy of the maintenance programme to the CAA, this does not prevent the CAA from requesting at any time the owner to send information about, or a copy of the AMP, even if deficiencies have not been reported (see AMC1 ML.B.201).

(f) Since the maintenance programme has to identify the alternatives tasks to the DAH’s instructions, the ARs and ACAM inspections can place emphasis on the inspection of the areas affected by those deviations in order to make sure that the maintenance programme is effective.

(g) Since the CAA is not responsible for the content of a declared maintenance programme, the CAA does not authorise the accomplishment of the scheduled maintenance to deviate from the AMP content (other than the tolerances provided for in ML.A.302(d)(1)). In such cases, the owner may declare an amended AMP.