GM32 Annex I Definitions

CAA ORS9 Decision No. 47

Text in magenta in force from 30 October 2025

DEFINITIONS OF TERMS RELATED TO ALL-WEATHER OPERATIONS

EFVSs — DIFFERENCES WITH ENHANCED VISION SYSTEMS (EVSs)

  1. Introduction to EVSs

    EVSs use sensing technology to improve a pilot’s ability to detect objects and topographical features ahead of the aircraft. Different types of sensing technology are used on different aircraft installations. Sensing technologies used include forward-looking infrared, millimetre wave radiometry, millimetre wave radar or low-light level intensification; additional technologies may be developed in the future. The image from sensors may be displayed to the pilot in a number of different ways including ‘head-up’ and ‘head-down’ displays.

  2. EVSs and EFVSs

    An EFVS is an EVS that is integrated with a flight guidance system, which presents the image from sensors to the pilot on a head-up display (HUD) or equivalent display. If EFVS equipment is certified according to the applicable airworthiness requirements and an operator holds the necessary specific approval, then an EFVS may be used for EFVS operations. An EFVS operation is an operation with an operational credit which allows operating in visibility conditions lower than those in which operations without the use of EFVS are permitted.

  3. Functions of EVSs

    Depending on the capabilities of the particular system, EVSs may be useful during operations at night or in reduced visibility for the following:

    1. improving visibility of airport features and other traffic during ground operations;

    2. displaying terrain and obstructions in flight;

    3. displaying weather in flight;

    4. improving visibility of the runway environment during approach operations; and

    5. improving visibility of obstructions on a runway (e.g. aircraft, vehicles or animals) during take-off and approach operations.

  4. Limitations of EVSs

    EVSs are a useful tool for enhancing situational awareness; however, each EVS installation has its own specific limitations. These may include:

    1. Performance variations depend on conditions including ambient temperature and lighting and weather phenomena. A system may provide very different image qualities in the same visibility depending on the particular phenomena causing restricted visibility, e.g. haze, rain, fog, snow, dust, etc.

    2. An EVS may not be able to detect certain types of artificial lighting. Light emitting diode (LED) lights have a much lower infrared signature than incandescent lights and therefore may not be detected by some types of EVSs. LED lighting is used for runway, taxiway and approach lighting at many airports.

    3. Monochrome display. EVSs will generally not be able to detect and display the colour of airport lighting. This means that colour coding used on airport lighting will not be visible to the pilot using an EVS.

    4. Many EVS installations do not have redundancy, so a single failure may lead to loss of EVS image.

    5. The location of the sensor on the airframe may mean that in certain conditions it could be susceptible to ice accretion or obscuration from impact damage from objects such as insects or birds.

    6. Where an EVS image is presented on a HUD or an equivalent display, the image needs to be consistent with the pilot’s external view through the display. Particular installations may have limitations on the conditions under which this consistent image can be generated (e.g. crosswind conditions during approach).

    7. Imaging sensor performance can be variable and unpredictable. Pilots should not assume that a flightpath is free of hazards because none are visible in an EVS image.

  5. Considerations for the use of EVSs

    EVSs may be used in all phases of flight and have significant potential to enhance the pilot’s situational awareness. No specific approval is required for the use of an EVS; however, the operator is responsible for ensuring that the flight crew members have received training on the equipment installed on their aircraft in accordance with ORO.FC.120. In addition, the operator is responsible for evaluating the risks associated with system limitations and for implementing suitable mitigation measures in accordance with ORO.GEN.200(a)(3) before using the EVS.

    The use of EVSs does not permit the use of different operating minima, and EVS images cannot replace natural vision for the required visual reference in any phase of flight including take-off, approach or landing.

    An EVS that is not an EFVS cannot be used for EFVS operations and therefore does not obtain an operational credit.